About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-193529 1 (1978-12-28)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacuoc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                      UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING  OFFICE
                               WASHINGTON,  D.C. 20548

                                                        IN REPLY
OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL                               REFER TO: B-193529

            b  F -n 14)'C 4~k     el % December 281978.

         The Honorable Barbara Allen Babcock
         Assistant Attorney General
         Civil Division
         Department of Justice   A.c       L9

              Attention:  E. John Bailey, Attorney
                         * Commercial Litigation Branch

         Dear Ms. Babcock:

              Subject:  Howard R. Barnett v. United States
                        Ct. Cl. No. 491-78

              Referepee.i  made to letter dated November 16, 1978 (file
         referenc  BAB:JFM:JBailey:jss  154-491-78), and statutory call form
         of the same date, requesting a report on the petition filed in the
         above-entitled case on November 13, 1978, wherein the plaintiff
         seeks jugoe nd other monies and benefits due plain-
         tiff as a result of wrongful conviction/by court-martial; an order
         expunging and eliminating any and all records of such court-martial
         from plaintiff's military records and forbidding any future con-
         sideration by defendant of said court-martial; an order directing
         defendant to restore plaintiff to the grade and rank in the United
 2-      States Army which plaintiff would currently hold but for the court-
         martial; and such other relief as the court may deem just and proper.

              There is no record of any claim having been filed in the
         General Accounting Office on account of the matters set forth in
         the petition and we have no information as to the facts in the
         case other than the allegations therein.

              The petition contains allegations relative to the plaintiff's
         court-martial conviction for violation of Articles 92 and 121 of
         the Uniform Code of Military Justice. 10 U.S.C. 892 and 921.
         Plaintiff contends in essence that he was denied his right to be
         represented by previously appointed qualified military counsel and
         his representation by civilian counsel was inadequate, thus
         resulting in his conviction by an i
         martial which was without iurisdiction to try him, and that as a
         result.thereof, he has been unlawfully denied more'than $6,449.60.






                                   0  02981