About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



AIMD-98-79R 1 (1998-02-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaclzj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                United States
GŁAO            General Accounting Office
                Washington, D.C. 20548

                Accounting and Information
                Management Division

                B-278609


                February 26, 1998

                The Honorable Charles C. Masten
                Inspector General
                Department of Labor

                Subject: Agreed-Upon Procedures: Federal Unemployment Taxes

                Dear Mr. Masten:

                We have performed the procedures contained in enclosure II to this letter,
                which we agreed to perform solely to assist your office in ascertaining whether
                the net federal unemployment tax (FUTA) collected by the Internal Revenue
                Service (IRS) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997, are supported by the
                underlying records. As agreed upon with your office, we evaluated fiscal year
                1997 FUTA net collection activity. See enclosure I to this letter for a schedule
                of these amounts (unaudited).

                This engagement to apply agreed-upon procedures was performed in accordance
                with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public
                Accountants (AICPA). Accordingly, the adequacy of the procedures to meet
                your objectives is your responsibility and we make no representations in that
                respect. The procedures we agreed to perform included (1) detailed tests of a
                sample of FUTA collection and refund transactions to check the validity of the
                transactions and their accurate accounting and reporting and (2) a review of
                key reconciliations of IRS to Department of the Treasury records. Enclosure II
                contains the agreed-upon procedures and our findings resulting from performing
                each of the procedures.

                We were not engaged to, and did not, perform an audit, the objective of which
                would be the expression of an opinion on the accompanying schedule of FUTA
                net collections reflected in enclosure I. Accordingly, we do not express such an
                opinion. Had we performed additional procedures, other matters might have
                come to our attention that would have been reported to you.

                We provided a draft of this letter to the IRS, along with its enclosures, for
                review and comment. IRS' Deputy Commissioner agreed with the contents of
                this letter and its enclosures.

                                                        GAO/AIMD-98-79R FUTA Procedures