About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



NSIAD-94-45R 1 (1993-11-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacklo0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



(3        United States
GAL       General Accounting Office
          Washington, D.C. 20548
          National Security and
          International Affairs Division

          B-254857

          November 22t 1993

          The Honorable John D. Dingell
          Chairman, Subcommittee on Oversight and
             Investigations
           Committee on Energy and Commerce
           House of Representatives

           Dear Mr. Chairman:

           This report responds to your request that we review the
           design and construction of certain ground support systems
           included in the production facility for the B-2 bomber at
           Air Force Plant 42, Palmdale, California. Specifically,
           you asked that we determine (1) the costs of correcting
           problems in the ground support systems that provide
           hydraulic pressure, cooling air, and fuel to B-2 aircraft
           during test and checkout and production flight tests; and
           (2) whether Northrop misrepresented problems with these
           systems to the Air Force. As a result of discussions
           with your office, we also reviewed the causes of the
           problems that occurred and determined whether some costs
           were incurred that might have been avoided. We also
           inquired about the level of oversight of the construction
           project provided by the Air Force.

           Your request made reference to a false claims act lawsuit
           brought against the Northrop Corporation by one of its
           employees, alleging that Northrop had installed
           ineffective ground support systems in one building, and
           had failed to install the systems in other buildings. It
           further alleged that Northrop, upon determining that the
           systems were ineffective, and knowing that the systems
           were not installed in some buildings, delivered the
           systems to the Air Force, misrepresented the causes of
           the problems to the Air Force, and inappropriately
           charged to the Air Force under a fixed-price construction
           contract, certain costs of repairing and or replacing the
           systems. The lawsuit was amended later to recognize that
           the contract was cost reimbursable. The false claims act
           lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice, with the consent
           of the United States Attorney, in July 1993.


GAO/NSIAD-94-45R B-2 Facilities