About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



RCED-92-240R 1 (1992-07-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaobackcg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          United States
GAO       General Accounting Office
         Washington, D.C. 20548

         Resources, Community, and
         Economic Development Division

         B-249435


         July 24, 1992


         The Honorable Philip R. Sharp
         Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy
           and Power
         Committee on Energy and Commerce
         House of Representatives
         The Honorable John D. Rockefeller IV
         United States Senate                                 147153

         On May 5, 1992, we briefed your representatives on our
         review of the experiences of alternative-fueled vehicle
         users and providers of alternative fuels. After the
         briefing and at a subsequent meeting, your representatives
         asked us to follow up on the following three additional
         issues: (1) the status of efforts to eliminate tunnel
         restrictions for gaseous-fueled vehicles in Baltimore,
         Boston, and New York; (2) the implications of Department of
         Transportation (DOT) regulations that require compressed
         natural gas (CNG) cylinders to be recertified; and (3) the
         consistency of alternative-fuel tax benefits contained in
         section 1913 of H.R. 776 with other alternative-fuel
         provisions of the bill. This letter summarizes the
         information we obtained on these three issues.

         TUNNEL ACCESS RESTRICTIONS

         We are aware of no restrictions that prohibit gaseous-fueled
         vehicles from using tunnels in any areas of the country
         except for Baltimore, Boston, and New York City. Two years
         ago, New York City allowed CNG vehicles to use its four
         tunnels and two enclosed bridges, but it does not allow
         vehicles fueled by liquefied petroleum gas (LPG or propane)
         to use these tunnels and bridges. Boston and Baltimore,
         with four and two tunnels respectively, prohibit both CNG-
         and LPG-fueled vehicles from using the tunnels.

         The agencies with regulatory authority over the tunnels and
         bridges in these three locations have recently supported
         relaxing their regulations that block access for gaseous-
         fueled vehicles. The agencies and CNG and LPG industry

                                         GAO/RCED-92-240R, Alternative Fuels

                               Q~4/