About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



AFMD-93-30ML 1 (1992-11-09)

handle is hein.gao/gaobachpz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

            United States
GAO         General Accounting Office
            Washington, D.C. 20548

            Accounting and Financial
            Management Division


            B-241514I II

            November 9, 1992
                                                            147942
            Mr. Gary B. Allison
            Acting Comptroller
            National Aeronautics and Space
              Administration

            Dear Mr. Allison:

            As part of our audit of the National Aeronautics and Space
            Administration's (NASA) internal controls and financial
            management systems and operations,1 we conducted work at
            NASA headquarters in the Agency Accounts and Reports Branch
            and the Budget Operations Office. During our work, we
            identified two instances where NASA did not follow proper
            procedures for certifying funds for obligation. We are
            bringing the instances to your attention because the
            certification of funds is a key control designed to ensure
            that appropriations are used in accordance with the will of
            the Congress.

            In the first instance, Agency Accounts and Reports Branch
            staff, who are responsible for certification of allotments,
            did not promptly certify reduced allotment levels. On
            November 8, 1989, NASA's Budget Operations Office prepared
            revised allotments to reduce funds originally allotted under
            a continuing resolution because the Office of Management and
            Budget (OMB) had advised NASA that the amounts NASA had
            calculated exceeded available amounts. The Agency Accounts
            and Reports Branch, however, did not certify and release the
            allotments until November 30, 1989. NASA avoided
            overobligations because, at the same time the Budget
            Operations Chief presented the revised allotments to the
            Branch for certification, he notified NASA's Centers and
            offices that their allotments would be reduced, and they
            canceled obligations accordingly. Had this informal action
            not been taken, NASA might have incurred overobligations.



            'Financial Management: NASA's Financial Reports Are Based
            on Unreliable Data, (GAO/AFMD-93-3, October 29, 1992).


                                                       GAO/AFMD-93-30ML




                                 c'       /I L41 9 2