About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



NSIAD-84-33 1 (1984-01-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabnfx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




     IUNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE
                              WASHINGTON. D.C. 20548

  k~nofo sacyy mo                               JANUARY 17. 1984
IVTUNNAOAL AFFAIMS DMSON


     B- 205555                                         Ih   IB  '


     The Honorable Bob Packwood                          123285
     United States Senate

     Dear Senator Packwood:

          Subject: Air Force Decision to Produce Liquid Oxygen
                    In-Rouse at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam
                    (dAO/NSIAD-84-33)

          In your letters of November 24, 1982, and March 11, 1983,
     you expressed concern that the Air Force may have violated
     Office of Management and Budget (ORB) Circular A-76 which
     prescribes the policies for acquiring commercial products and
     services needed by the government. In particular, you were con-
     cerned that the cost comparison which was the basis for the
     decision to produce liquid oxygen (LOX) in-house appeared to
     contain many serious flaws and that the Air Force did not pro-
     perly notify the supplier, Island Equipment Company, of the
     results of the cost comparison in time for the company to appeal
     the results. You requested that we review this matter.

     FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

          In our opinion, the Air Force complied with the provisions
     of OMB Circular A-76 and performed its cost comparison in
     accordance with the circular. We believe that several adjust-
     ments of various cost items in the comparison were warranted
     which would have reduced the estimated savings of in-house
     performance. However, even with these adjustments, the cost
     comparison still showed in-house production to be less costly.
     The Air Force cost comparison showed that over a 3-year period
     about $487,000 could be saved from the contracting cost of $1.9
     million by producing LOX in-house. We estimate a potential
     savings of about $316,000.

          Island Equipment was also concerned that because it was not
     properly notified of the results of the cost comparison, it was
     not afforded the opportunity to appeal the results. As required
     by Defense Acquisition Regulations, the Air Force announced the
     results of the cost comparison at bid opening. Although Island


                  §4IUCTED - Not to be released o f 
                  Amreumt!n Ofice except on t'-e -     942278
                  by U,,, O. e of Co--gresstotai RELEASED

                                  !51   .q1