About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



PLRD-83-86 1 (1983-06-16)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabmzv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                       UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE /2I
                              WASHINGTON, ,Z.C. 20548


  NAT ONAL. SECURITY AND
INTERNA71ONAL AFFAIRS DIVISION                   JUN  16 1983

     B-206570


     The Honorable Joseph P. Addabbo
     Chairman, Subcommittee on Defense
       Committee on Appropriations
     House of Representatives

     The Honorable Ted Stevens
     Chairman, Subcommittee on Defense
       Committee on Appropriations
     United States Senate

          Subject: i'Analysis of the Department of Defense's Request
                    for Multiyear Contract Authority for the B-IB
                    Weapon System (GAO/PLRD-83-86)

          This is our first report in response to your requests for
     our analysis of projects proposed by the Defense Department for
     multiyear contracting. As requested, this report concentrates
     on the results of our analysis of Defense's request for multi-
     year procurement authority for the B-lB weapon system and the
     impact of economic order quantity buying. Other proposed multi-
     year projects will be considered during our analysis of
     Defense's fiscal year 1984 budget request.

          As you requested, we did not obtain rocinal cofminents from
     Defense officials on this report. We have, however, discussed
     the issues raised herein with Air Force program office personnel
     responsible for the B-lB program. We briefed your staff on sev-
     eral occasions as our work progressed and assisted them in pre-
     paring for hearings held by your Subcommittee.

     OBJECTIVES, SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY

          Our work was directed at assessing whether Defense's fiscal
     year 1983 supplemental request and its fiscal year 1984 budget
     request to initiate multiyear contracts under the B-1B programn
     met the legislative criteria for benefit to the government (sav-
     ings), degree of cost confidence (reliable estimates) and
     stability of design. We discusse   e      :ch oi the foregoing areas
     with Air Force program office officials and reviewed underlying
     supporting documentation that was made available. Information
     supporting cost savings ana contract costs was limited to budge-
     tary data and program office estimates. Although the 9-17 Pro-
     gram Office has received contractor proposals, analysis and
     negotiations are incomplete.

                                                              (942256)



                              / P v 7(r