About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



FPCD-83-15 1 (1982-12-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabmtc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



     *UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE
                          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548


FEDERAL PERSONNEL AND
COMPENSATION DIVISION


     B-208668                                          DECEMBER 22,1982




     The Honorable Donald J. Devine
     Director, Office of Personnel                            1110
       Management                                              120180

     Dear Dr. Devine:

          Subject: Agency Administrative Systems Need Attention
                    (GAO/FPCD-83-15)

          We have completed a review of administrative grievance sys-
     tems at selected Federal agencies and found some shortcomings
     which could lessen the effectiveness of the grievance proce-
     dures. These are (1) untimely processing of grievances by
     agencies and (2) lack of formal systematic methods to determine
     how well the systems operate.

     BACKGROUND

          Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, part 771, as promul-
     gated by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), requires Fed-
     eral agencies to establish, publicize, and administer a griev-
     ance system generally for nonbargaining unit employees. The
     system is available to covered employees for personal relief in
     any matter of concern or dissatisfaction which is subject to the
     control of agency management, such as poor working conditions,
     failure to follow rules and regulations, short-term suspensions,
     changes in official assignments, and nonselection for training
     opportunities.

          Federal agencies are allowed flexibility in establishing
     administrative grievance procedures to suit their particular
     conditions and characteristics. The typical grievance system,
     in the agencies we reviewed, included an informal discussion be-
     tween the employee and the immediate supervisor. If the griev-
     ance was not resolved through informal discussion, it proceeded
     through a sequence of steps for review and response by progres-
     sively higher levels of management. If the grievance remained
     unresolved, the matter was decided by a top management official,
     and this decision was final.


(966054)