About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-201204 1 (1981-01-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabjyj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 







GAO
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548


Donald Stever, Jr.
Chief, Pollution Control Section
Room 2644
U.S. Department of Justice
9th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.
Washington, D.C. 20530


  Office of
  General Counsel
  In Reply
  Refer to: B-201204
57'     January 23, 1'


      Q-~ Ue,&CM   .4


Dear Mr. Stever:

     This responds to your letter of November 10, 1980. The United
States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has
remanded the case of Environmental Defense Fund v. Costle, No. 79-1473
(D.C. Cir. 1980), in which you are handling EPA's defense. On remand
the Court ordered the District Court to explore the following question:

          whether it is ever within the authority of a
          district court to enter and enforce a consent
          judgment which restricts the discretion an
          agency might otherwise have in selecting the
          means by which it will meet its mandatory re-
          sponsibilities under a general framework
          statute * * *.   Slip Op. at 57.

You request our opinion as one of many potentially affected Federal
agencies since the Court feels that the question may have far reaching
implications affecting other federal departments and agencies.

     Our interest stems from our general ,concern that Federal agencies
be able to meet their statutory duties in the most cost-effective and
efficient manner within the bounds of the law. In this regard we view
the continuing viability of court-enforced consent agreements to be of
significant import to the Federal Government generally, and we offer
the following coimnents in support of an affirmative answer to the
Court's stated question.

     The instant controversy involves an agreement entered into by the
EPA and environmental interest groups who initially brought suit to com-
pel the agency to meet its statutory duties under the Federal Water Pol-
lution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. (1976). The authority of


/0 Alt.