About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



MASAD-81-44 1 (1981-09-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabckg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                  COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
                           WASHINGTON D.C. WS



B-204656                                         SEPTEMBER 15, 1981



The Honorable Joseph P. Addabbo
Chairman, Subcommittee on Defense
Committee on Appropriations
House of Representatives                             116378

Dear Mr. Chairman:

   Subject: Evaluation of the Army's Advanced Field Artillery
             Tactical Data System (MASAD-81-44)

     Your December 12, 1980, letter asked us to evaluate (1) the
progress of the Army's Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data Sys-
tem (AFATDS) program and (2) the Army's plan for adopting components
of the Marine Integrated Fire and Air Support System (MIFASS) for
use in the AFATDS program. You were concerned whether the Army
would make the proper choice for the AFATDS approach in terms of
total cost, operational suitability, and timeliness. Also, you
wanted assurance that the Army's development and acquisition pro-
cedures allowed for maximum competition.

     The specific objectives of our evaluation were to (1) identify
and assess the Army's decision to acquire AFATDS, (2) assess the
extent of competition planned for the AFATDS program, and (3)
analyze the MIFASS architecture and identify those components and
features that could be candidates for incorporation into AFATDS.
Information on the scope, methodology, and limitations of our
evaluation is in the enclosure.
                   I
     Our evaluation showed:

     --The Army has decided to modularly improve the existing Tac-
       tical Fire Direction System (TACFIRE) to provide for a fu-
       ture field artillery command and control system. Although
       this approach, in our opinion, is the proper choice in
       terms of operational suitability and timeliness, the Army
       needs to establish a sound basis to assure that the most
       cost-effective system is being acquired to meet user needs.

     --The Army's plans provide for ample equipment competition.
       Software, however, will be developed in-house.

     --MIFASS was rejected as a follow-on system candidate, but a
       reconfigured MIFASS architecture or components may be
       usable in AFATDS.

                                                      (954002)