About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



CED-79-104 1 (1979-06-28)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaazkv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                   UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE      oe758
                          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548


COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

      B-153449                                      JUNE 28, 1979



      The Honorable Juanita M. Kreps
      The Secretary of Commerce ',&O00?

      Dear Madam Secretary:

           In December 1978, the General Accounting Office began
      ajsurvey of the Economic Development Administration's (EDA's)
      implementation of the title IX program. The program, which
      was designed to save or create jobs and stimulate the economy
      of depressed areas, has been recently reorganized by EDA
      to improve its administration and effectiveness. As a re-
      sult, our survey was suspended to allow EDA enough time to
      carry out the program changes.

           However, we noted during the survey that grantees'
      compliance with reporting requirements has been weak. Grant-
      ees have not submitted required reports, and EDA has not made
      sufficient effort to collect progress data from grantees.
      Further, the Congress lacks data on the program's effective-
      ness in assisting communities. The title IX annual reports
      submitted to the Congress merely reiterate the intended pur-
      pose of grants approved during the reporting year. For the
      most part, EDA has followed the practice of not providing
      program results data on prior year grants.

           The survey was conducted at EDA headquarters in Washing-
      ton, D.C., and its Atlantic regional office in Philadelphia,   -
      Pennsylvania. The survey was limited to 21 title IX grants   ly
      within the Atlantic region approved during 1975-77. These
      grants were selected because enough time has passed that        1
      progress should have occurred and grantee reports should   o   .
      have been submitted. Grant files and pertinent title IX
      policies, procedures, and guidelines were reviewed. We
      discussed the grants' status with EDA project managers and   \
      visited four grantees for onsite observation. The 1975-78 \.  9
      title IX annual reports to the Congress were also analyzed.





                                                          05CED-79-10
                                                          (069170)