About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



FGMSD-78-4 1 (1977-11-11)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaawfa0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


DCCUEIT RESURE


04022 - [B31944191

The Air Force Audit Agency Can Be Babe Bore Effective.
FGISD-78-4; B-134192. November 11v 1977. 26 pp. * 5 appendices
(35 pp.).
Report to the Congress; by Robert F. Keller, Acting Comptrcller
General.
Issue Area: Internal Auditing Systems: Sufficiuncy of Federal
     Auditors and Coverage (201j.
 Contact: Financial and General P- agement Studies Div.
 Budget Function: National Defense: Department of Defense -
     Military (excapt procurement 9 contracts) 1051).
 Orqanization Concerned: Department of the Air Force: Air Prce
     Audit Agency.
 Conressional Relevance: Congress.
 Authority: Budget and Accounting Procedures Act of 1950, sec.
     113 (31 U.S.C. 66a). National Security Act of '1947# as
     amended (10 U.S.C. 3014; 10 U.S.C. 5061: 10 U.S.C. 8014).
     P.L. 93-365. 10 U.S.C. 125. Federal management Circular
     73-2. Air F rce Regulation 23-38. Air force Regulation
     175-4., DOD Directive 1100.9.

          The Air Force should make its internal audit stronger
 tu k.,p top management better informed or how operations are
 conducted and how recommendations for improvements are carriad
 out.  Findings/Conclusions: Because internal auditing is not
 higqh eD-1uqh in the Air Force organizational stractaxe, auditors
 de, not have maximum independence in FlAnnin9 a conducting
 audits. Although Department of Defense policy reqAres all
 nonsilitary positions to be filled by civilians, the tudit
 Aqency has about an equal number of military and civilian
 employees.  Recomaendations: The Secretary of Defense should use
 his reorganization authority to relocate the Air Force Audit
 Aqency under the Secretary or Under Secretary of the Aix Force
 and have the audit staff report directly tc that official. Also,
 the Secretary of Defense should direct the Secretary of the lir
 Force to: eliminate all restrictions oc the Audit a&en--I in
 selecting activities for audit, determinin, the scope of workr
 and reportinq results; sore clearly define the tature and scope
 of audits and inspections; fill the position of Auditor General
 with a qualified civilian; a;point civilians tc most auditor
 positions currently filled by militarr personnel; and improve
 orqaDizatic-al structure and management ccatro- to use itaff
 more eftectively. Alternatives for this last recommendation
 include reducing audits cn commander-requested and
 ncnappropriated-fund work and reorganizing the Audit Agency by
 region. In order to assure that the greater dudit independence
 recommended is maintained in the future, the Congreas should
 amend existing legislation to place the internal audit functions
 of the three military services under the secretary or under
secretary of the respective departmepts to whom the auditors