About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



CED-77-91 1 (1977-07-12)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaavvr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
DOCUMENT RESUME


02156 - [A1993063] (Restricted)

[Alleged Discrimination in Insuring Profit-Making Multifamily
Hoiusing Projects]. CED-77-91; B-164855. JuJy 12, 1977. 5 pp.

Report to Rep. Ronald V. Dellums; by Elmer B. Staats,
Comptroller General.

Issue Area: Non-Discrimination and Equal Opportunity Programs:
    Discrimination in Housing (1006); Domestic Housing and
    Community Development: Housing fLu Low and Moderate Income
    Families (2101).
Contact: Community and Economic Development Div.
Budget Function: Commerce and Transportation: Mortgage Credit
    and Thrift Insurance (401).
Organization Concerned: Department of Housing and Urban
    Development.
Congressional Relevance: Rep. Ronald V. Dellums.

         GAO investigated certain allegations by black
developers that the Department of Housing and Urban
Development's (HUD) San Francisco regional office systematically
discriminated against minority developers in HUD's insured
profitmaking housing projects. Findings/Conclusions: Walter J.
Taylor and Albert L. McKee alleged that HUD conspired against
them in refusing to insure their multifamily projects for
reasons of racial discrimination and that HUD's underwriting
regulations work to discriminate against blacks. No evidence was
found by GAO to support the complainants' allegations. Further,
the challenged underwriting procedures, specifically the fair
market rent test and the financial resources requirement, were
judged reasonable and necessary to help assure approval of
economically sound projects and protect the Government's
interest. Basically, both projects were affected by the same
factor, building cost increases, that would have required
charging higher rents than those charged for comparable
dwellings in the area, which is specifically forbidden by HOD
underwriting procedures. Also, HUD's income estimate for the
projects was lower than the amount needed to justify the level
of mortgage insurance required. (DJM)