About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



RCED-00-280R 1 (2000-09-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaallt0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



   SGAO

        Accountabiity * Integrity * Rehiability
United States General Accounting Office                           Resources, Community, and
Washington, DC 20548                                          Economic Development Division



         B-285175


         September 8, 2000


         The Honorable Rick Lazio
         Chairman, Subcommittee on Housing
         and Community Opportunity
         Committee on Banking and Financial Services
         House of Representatives
         Subject: Mortgage Financing: Level of Annual Premiums That Place a Ceiling on

                  Distributions to FHA Policyholders

         Dear Mr. Chairman:

         From 1943 to 1990, the programs supported by the Federal Housing Administration's
         (FHA) Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund paid distributive shares to homeowners who
         had voluntarily terminated their mortgages by paying off the mortgage on time, or
         early, such as when refinancing.1 In 1990, after the Fund began experiencing
         substantial losses, the Congress required FHA to stop paying distributive shares until
         the Fund had accumulated adequate reserves- current cash plus the net present
         value of future cash flows. While not defining what level of reserves are adequate,
         the Congress required that the Secretary take steps to ensure that the Fund achieve
         minimum reserves equaling 2 percent of the insurance-in-force. Thus, in determining
         whether there is a surplus for distributing to borrowers, the Secretary must now take
         into account the actuarial status of the entire Fund.2 After several years of improved
         Fund performance, the reserve was estimated to have first met the 2-percent
         minimum requirement in 1995 and was estimated to have reached 3.66 percent in
         1999. FHA has not renewed paying distributive shares and believes that it would only
         be prudent to consider doing so if the Fund's capital ratio exceeded 3 percent.


         'Because the risk of an insurance claim is usually the greatest during the first 7 years of a mortgage,
         FHA generally did not pay distributive shares to borrowers who had terminated their mortgages within
         7 years of receiving them.
         2 In contrast, borrowers who had voluntarily terminated their mortgages within a specified time
         period-now 7 years-have received refunds of their up-front insurance premiums regardless of the
         actuarial status of the Fund.


GAO/RCED-00-280R FHA Distributive Shares