About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



CED-76-123 1 (1976-06-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaaama0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                 SC~gt-76                                   72
0COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES

                         WASHINGTON. D.C. 20548



                                              JUN 1 51 976

   B-125053



   The Honorable Herman E. Talmadge
   Chairman, Committee on Agriculture
     and Forestry
   United States Senate

   Dear Mr. Chairman:

        Your letter of May 26, 1976, confirmed an earlier informal
   request that our Office review the[back-up data supporting the
   National Forest Products Association's, discussion paper of
   May 10, 1976, in opposition to S. 3091--the proposed National
   Forest Management Act of 1976--as reported out of your Committee
   and the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. Insofar as
   time permitted, we were to analyze the Association's documented
   data and inform you of the results within 4 weeks. It was
   agreed that the analysis would address the Association's con-
   tentions that:

        (1) Timber supply from national forests lands will
             decrease by 20 percent over the next decade.

        (2) The ability to meet housing goals will be de-
             creased by approximately 200,000 homes each year.

        (3) The non-declining sustained timber yield policy
             will result in the waste of an estimated 180
             billion board feet of timber worth more than
             $9 billion in terms of 1976 dollars.

        (4) The decline in timber supply will increase wood
             product prices enough to add $1,200 to $1,400
             to the cost of an average new home.

        (5) Many regional economies would be adversely affected
             by irregular or reduced national forest harvest
             levels.

        On May 14, 1976, we asked representatives of the Associa-
   tion to provide us with back-up documentation supporting its
   May 10 discussion paper, especially the contentions listed
   above. We were told that some of the statements in the paper
   had been made on the basis of the Association's experience,


                                                   CED-76-123