About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



1 [1] (March 18, 2026)

handle is hein.crs/govetvf0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





Informing the Iegislative debate since 1914


Updated March  18, 2026


Central Bank Digital Currencies

Policymakers have debated whether the Federal Reserve
(Fed) should create a central bank digital currency
(CBDC)-a digital  dollar. A CBDC  would share some of
the technical features of cryptocurrencies (crypto)-that is,
private digital currencies, such as Bitcoin, which are
unsupported by any government authority. This In Focus
describes how foreign central banks, the Administration,
Congress, and the Fed are approaching the issue and
discusses policy issues. For more detail, see CRS Report
R46850,  Central Bank Digital Currencies: Policy Issues.

ackground
Contrary to some of its creators' expectations, crypto has
not become widely adopted for payments-its value has
been too volatile to serve as an effective means of payment,
transaction costs are too high, and it is neither legal tender
nor backed by the full faith and credit of a government.
Stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency intended to keep a
constant value, were introduced to overcome the volatility
issue but have also not been widely adopted for retail
payments. (P.L. 119-27 was recently enacted to encourage
further adoption of stablecoins.) A CBDC, proponents
believe, could overcome these barriers while taking
advantage of the technology pioneered by crypto to create a
more efficient, central-bank-backed digital payment system.

Within the mainstream financial system, digital payments
are already widespread in the United States. At present,
digital payments are not always as fast, inexpensive, or
ubiquitous as some would desire. A CBDC would
presumably allow for real-time payments (i.e., instant
settlement). Real-time payments are growing rapidly but are
not yet ubiquitous in the United States. Their growth has
accelerated since the introduction of FedNow, the Fed's
real-time settlement system, in 2023. By contrast,
developing a CBDC  would take several years of significant
information technology investment and testing.

Federal Reserve and Executive Actions
In January 2022, the Fed released a report on CBDC, which
it defined as a digital liability of a central bank that is
widely available to the general public. In the Fed's view,
CBDC   transactions would need to be final and completed
in real time, allowing users to make payments to one
another using a risk-free asset. Individuals, businesses, and
governments could potentially use a CBDC to make basic
purchases of goods and services or pay bills, and
governments could use a CBDC  to collect taxes or make
benefit payments directly to citizens.

The report identified four characteristics that it argued were
necessary to best serve the needs of the United States,
saying that a CBDC should be (1) privacy-protected to the
extent compatible with deterring criminal use, (2)


intermediated (i.e., retail services would be offered through
financial institutions), (3) widely transferable among
holders, and (4) identity-verified (i.e., not anonymous). The
report took no position on several design features, such as
whether the CBDC  should pay interest, whether it should be
available for use offline, and whether there should be size
limits on transactions or holdings. The report stated that the
Fed does not intend to proceed with issuance of a CBDC
without clear support from the executive branch and from
Congress, ideally in the form of a specific authorizing law.
The report is not intended to advance a specific policy
outcome  and takes no position on the ultimate desirability
of a U.S. CBDC. The Fed has also initiated pilot programs
(Projects Hamilton, Cedar, and Agora) to build technical
capacity pending a decision to adopt a CBDC.

In March 2022, President Biden issued Executive Order
14067 on digital assets, which stated that the U.S.
government  should prioritize timely assessments of
potential benefits and risks [of a U.S. CBDC] under various
designs to ensure that the United States remains a leader in
the international financial system. Pursuant to that order,
Treasury, in consultation with various agencies, issued a
report on CBDC  in September 2022. That report did not
take a position on whether to pursue a CBDC. In January
2025, President Trump issued Executive Order 14178 on
digital financial technology. The order stated that agencies
are prohibited from undertaking any action to establish,
issue, or promote a CBDC and should terminate any
plans or initiatives related to the creation of a CBDC.

Desin Considerations
A CBDC   would allow holders to store value and make
payments digitally and would be backed by the Fed (as is
the case for physical currency), but other features are
unresolved. Crypto generally records transfers on public,
decentralized (or distributed) ledgers stored using
blockchain technology. Often individuals' accounts are
cryptographically protected and pseudonymous. It is
unclear which of these features would be desirable in a
CBDC   or whether a CBDC  might be built upon existing
payment  systems instead.

From  an end-user perspective, CBDC proposals range from
a payment system similar to the status quo to one that is
fundamentally different. At one end of the spectrum of
proposals, a CBDC accessible only to banks may differ
only slightly from the current system given that wholesale
payment  systems are already digital. At the other end,
proposals for consumers to be able to hold CBDCs in
accounts at the Fed would fundamentally change the role of
the Fed and its relationship with consumers and banks. The
Fed's report envisioned a middle ground where end users
would access CBDC   and related services through financial