About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



1 [1] (January 21, 2026)

handle is hein.crs/govetlf0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




Con re &on I flesedrch Service
horniig Aecji ivede a~m 'e1914


0


                                                                                         Updated  January 21, 2026

DOD Replicator Initiative: Background and Issues for Congress


Introduction
Replicator, unveiled on August 28, 2023, is a Department
of Defense (DOD)  initiative to field thousands of uncrewed
systems by August 2025. (DOD  is now using a secondary
Department of War designation, under Executive Order
14347 dated September 5, 2025.) Replicator's first line of
effort (Replicator 1) is to field all-domain, attritable
autonomous  (ADA2)  systems. Attritable systems are
comparatively low-cost systems with which DOD tolerates
a greater degree of risk of system loss. In a September 27,
2024, memo,  then-Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin
announced that Replicator's second line of effort
(Replicator 2) is to focus on countering small uncrewed
aerial systems (C-sUAS). A key issue facing Congress is
whether to approve, reject, or modify DOD's funding
requests for Replicator, and whether Congress has adequate
information about Replicator to assess its merits and
conduct effective oversight of the initiative.

  ackground
DOD   officials state that the Replicator initiative draws from
lessons learned in the ongoing Ukraine-Russia conflict, in
which Ukraine has leveraged large numbers (estimated by
observers to be as many as 10,000 per month) of low-cost
attritable systems to counter the Russian military's
advantage in force strength. Former Deputy Secretary of
Defense Kathleen Hicks has stated that Replicator is
intended to help [the United States] overcome [the Chinese
military's] advantage in mass: more ships, more missiles,
more forces.

DOD   officials describe Replicator 1 as an all-domain
initiative that could include autonomous aerial, ground,
surface, sub-surface, and/or space systems representing a
range of capabilities and mission sets. For example, former
Deputy Secretary Hicks stated that Replicator could include
distributed pods of self-propelled ADA2 [sensor] systems
to provide near-real time intelligence, fleets of ground-
based ADA2   systems delivering novel logistics support ...
or securing DOD infrastructure, or space-based ADA2
systems to provide resilient communications.

Intent
Replicator 1 is to deploy uncrewed systems en masse,
allowing the U.S. military to disperse combat power over a
large number of relatively inexpensive systems. Replicator
1 is intended to
*  avoid concentrating U.S. combat power into a smaller
   number  of individually more expensive platforms (i.e.,
   help avoid putting too many eggs into one basket);
*  make  it harder for an adversary to target and neutralize
   U.S. capabilities; and
*  create an unfavorable cost-exchange ratio for the
   adversary, meaning a situation in which the adversary


   would need to use a countermeasure, such as an
   interceptor missile, that has a much higher cost than the
   Replicator system against which it is directed.

Some  observers have stated that, depending on the
capabilities of Replicator systems, the Replicator initiative
could lead to the development of new military concepts of
operation, such as swarming. Swarming is a form of
cooperative behavior in a group of uncrewed systems, in
which the uncrewed systems autonomously coordinate with
one another to accomplish a mission. Swarming would
likely require further advancements in artificial intelligence
and/or networked communications to be deployed.

DOD   officials state that, in contrast to large and
individually expensive systems such as aircraft carriers,
Replicator systems are intended to be built and deployed
more quickly, and to be used for significantly shorter
periods of time before being replaced by successor designs.
(They emphasize, however, that Replicator is intended to
supplement-not  replace-more   exquisite systems.) These
officials state that Replicator is thus intended to improve
DOD's  processes for rapidly scaling, fielding, and
innovating new capabilities. They note that Replicator is
also intended to accelerate the development of the U.S.
drone industrial base.

Specific Replicator  Capabilities and Systems
DOD   has released only limited information about specific
Replicator capabilities or systems due to what DOD states
are operational security concerns. Former Deputy Secretary
Hicks has stated that DOD intends to reveal details about
the Replicator initiative, including information about
specific capabilities and systems, at a time and place and
manner  of our choosing. DOD officials have confirmed
the selection of AeroVironment's Switchblade 600 loitering
munition, Anduril's Altius-600 and Ghost-X UAS, and
Performance Drone  Works' C-100 UAS,  as well as
uncrewed  surface vehicles, uncrewed aerial systems, and
counter-uncrewed aerial systems of various sizes and
payloads. Anduril's Dive-LD uncrewed undersea vehicle
is reportedly also among those selected, as is Fortem
Technologies' DroneHunter F700. In addition, DOD has
selected seven companies to provide software support for
Replicator's autonomy and command  and control.

Status
DOD   has reportedly completed the second tranche of
selections for Replicator 1 (i.e., Replicator 1.2). This
second tranche, one official stated, is likely to focus on
software to enable system collaboration to create lethal
effects and respond to a very dynamic environment against
different threats and ... different adversary platforms. On
August 27, 2025, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth (now
using Secretary of War as a secondary title under