About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



1 [1] (November 13, 2025)

handle is hein.crs/govessm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 








                                                                                       Updat

Defense Primer: Budgeting for National and Defense

Intelligence


Introduction
Intelligence Community (IC) programs include the
resources (i.e., money and personnel) to accomplish
intelligence-related goals and responsibilities as defined in
Title 50 of the United States Code (U.S.C.) and Executive
Order 12333, United States Intelligence Activities. IC
programs are funded through the (1) National Intelligence
Program  (NIP), which covers the programs, projects, and
activities of the IC oriented toward the strategic
requirements of policymakers; and (2) Military Intelligence
Program  (MIP), which funds defense intelligence activities
intended to support tactical military requirements and
operations. The Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and
the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and
Security (USD(I&S)), who is using Under Secretary of War
for Intelligence and Security as a secondary title under
Executive Order 14347 dated September 5, 2025, manage
the NIP and MIP, respectively, under different authorities.

NIP   and   MiP   Fundi  ng
Title 50 U.S.C. §3306 requires that the President, as part of
the annual budget submission to Congress, disclose the total
amount of funding-called the topline-requested for the
NIP. The DNI  is not required to disclose any other
information concerning the NIP budget, such as whether
funds would be used for particular intelligence agencies or
particular intelligence programs. Although not mandated by
statute, the Secretary of Defense, who is using Secretary of
War  as a secondary title under Executive Order 14347
dated September 5, 2025, has disclosed annual MIP
appropriations totals dating back to 2007. For FY2026,
funding requested for the NIP and MIP totaled $115.5
billion, including $81.9 billion for NIP and $33.6 billion for
MIP. Compared  to FY2025  requested amounts of $73.4
billion for the NIP and $28.2 billion for the MIP, the
FY2026  budget requested $8.5 billion and $5.4 billion
more, respectively. It also represents an increase of a total
of $9.2 billion more than the FY2024 appropriated totals
($106.3 billion: $76.5 billion for the NIP and $29.8 billion
for the MIP).

Background

NationaL  Intellgence  Program   (NIP)
The origins of the intelligence budget, separate and distinct
from the defense budget, date to reforms initiated in the
1970s to improve oversight and accountability of the IC. At
that time, the National Foreign Intelligence Program (NFIP)
was managed  by the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI),
in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, and overseen
by the National Security Council (NSC). Congress
redesignated the NFIP as the NIP in the Intelligence
Reform  and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (IRTPA;


ed November  13, 2025


P.L. 108-458, §1074). The IRTPA also provided for
additional IC reforms, including the position of DNI. The
DNI  was given more budgetary authority over the NIP than
the DCI had over the NFIP. Intelligence Community
Directive (ICD) 104 provides overall policy, including a
description of the DNI's roles and responsibilities as
program executive of the NIP.

Military Intelgence   Program   (MIP)
Military-specific tactical and/or operational intelligence
activities were not included in the NFIP. They were known
as Tactical Intelligence and Related Activities (TIARA) and
managed  separately by the Secretary of Defense. TIARA
referred to the intelligence programs, platforms, and
capabilities supporting the units of a particular military
service. In 1994, Congress created a new category called
the Joint Military Intelligence Program (JMIP) for defense-
wide intelligence programs, platforms, and capabilities. In
2005, the Secretary of Defense signed a memorandum that
merged  TIARA  and JMIP to form the MIP. DOD  Directive
5205.12, effective November 27, 2024, established policy
and assigned responsibilities within the MIP, including the
USD(I&S)'s  role as program executive of the MIP.

A program  is primarily NIP if it funds an activity that
supports more than one department or agency (such as
satellite imagery), or provides a service supporting multiple
IC elements (such as secure communications). The NIP
funds the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Office
of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) in their
entirety, and funds the strategic intelligence activities
associated with IC components of United States
government  departments, suchDOD's  National Security
Agency  (NSA).

A program  is primarily MIP if it funds an activity that
addresses a unique DOD requirement. Additionally, MIP
funds may be used to sustain, enhance, or increase
capacity/capability of NIP systems. The DNI and
USD(I&S)  have worked  together to facilitate the integration
of NIP and MIP intelligence efforts. Mutually beneficial
programs have received both NIP and MIP resources.

Two Budget Processes: PP                    PP
The IC's Intelligence Planning, Programming, Budgeting
and Evaluation (IPPBE) process allocates funding and
personnel resources for IC-wide capabilities through the
development and execution of the NIP and its associated
budget. The NIP addresses priorities described in national
security-related documents such as the National Intelligence
Strategy. The IPPBE process has applied to all 18
components  of the IC, as specified in 50 U.S.C. §3003(4).
Program managers  have controlled NIP resources aligned