About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



1 [1] (May 7, 2024)

handle is hein.crs/govepqf0001 and id is 1 raw text is: Con re &on I flesedrch Service
h n~lg Aeg~ I9ivede a~i~ 'e1914

Updated May 7, 2024

Defense Primer: Directed-Energy Weapons

Both the 2022 National Defense Strategy and the House
Armed Services Committee's bipartisan Future of Defense
Task Force Report have identified directed energy as a
technology that could have a significant impact on U.S.
national security in the years to come. As the Department of
Defense (DOD) continues to invest in directed-energy (DE)
weapons, Congress may consider implications for defense
authorizations, appropriations, and oversight.
Overy ew
DOD defines DE weapons as those using concentrated
electromagnetic energy, rather than kinetic energy, to
incapacitate, damage, disable, or destroy enemy
equipment, facilities, and/or personnel. DE weapons
include high-energy lasers (HEL) and high-powered
microwave (HPM) weapons; other DE weapons, such as
particle beam weapons, are outside the scope of this In
Focus.
HELs might be used by ground forces in short-range air
defense (SHORAD), counter-unmanned aircraft systems
(C-UAS), or counter-rocket, artillery, and mortar (C-RAM)
missions. The weapons might be used to dazzle (i.e.,
temporarily disable) or damage satellites and sensors. This
could in turn interfere with intelligence-gathering
operations; military communications; and positioning,
navigation, and timing systems used for weapons targeting.
In addition, HELs could theoretically provide options for
boost-phase missile intercept, given their speed-of-light
travel time; however, experts disagree on the affordability,
technological feasibility, and utility of this application.
In general, HELs might offer lower costs per shot and-
assuming access to a sufficient power supply-deeper
magazines compared with traditional munitions. (Although
a number of different types of HELs exist, many of the
United States' current programs are solid state lasers, which
are fueled by electrical power. As a result, the cost per shot
is equivalent to the cost of the electrical power required to
fire the shot.) This could in turn produce a favorable cost-
exchange ratio for the defender, whose marginal costs
would be significantly lower than those of the aggressor.
Similarly, HPM weapons could provide a nonkinetic means
of disabling adversary electronics and communications
systems. These weapons could potentially generate effects
over wider areas than HELs, which emit a narrower beam
of energy. As a result, some analysts have noted that HPM
weapons might provide more effective area defense against
missile salvos and swarms of drones. HPM weapons have
also been considered for use as nonlethal heat ray
systems for crowd control.

DirectedE-nergy Weapons Programs
A number of countries are investing in directed-energy
weapons programs. This In Focus discusses a selection of
unclassified DE weapons programs in three leading military
powers: the United States, China, and Russia.
United States
DOD requested approximately $789.7 million for
unclassified DE programs in FY2025-down from its
$962.4 million request and $1.1 billion appropriation in
FY2024. (For additional information about specific U.S.
DE weapons programs, see CRS Report R44175, Navy
Lasers, Railgun, and Gun-Launched Guided Projectile:
Background and Issues for Congress, by Ronald O'Rourke,
and CRS Report R45098, U.S. Army Weapons-Related
Directed Energy (DE) Programs: Background and
Potential Issuesfor Congress, by Andrew Feickert.) DOD
does not currently have any DE programs of record.
DOD directed energy programs are coordinated by the
Principal Director for Directed Energy within the Office of
the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and
Engineering (OUSD[R&E]). The Principal Director for
Directed Energy is additionally responsible for
development and oversight of the Directed Energy
Roadmap. According to OUSD(R&E), DOD's DE roadmap
outlines DOD's plan to increase power levels of DE
weapons from around 150 kilowatts (kW-a unit of power),
as is currently feasible, to 500 kW-with reduced size and
weight-by FY2025. DOD seeks to further reduce size
and weight and increase power to MW [megawatt] levels
by FY2026. For reference, although there is no consensus
regarding the precise power level that would be needed to
neutralize different target sets, some analysts believe that
lasers of around 100 kW could engage unmanned aircraft
systems, small boats, rockets, artillery, and mortars,
whereas lasers of around 300 kW could additionally engage
cruise missiles flying in certain profiles (i.e., flying
across-rather than at-the laser). Lasers of 1 MW could
potentially neutralize ballistic missiles and hypersonic
weapons.
In addition to the DE roadmap, OUSD(R&E) manages the
High Energy Laser Scaling Initiative (HELSI), which
former Principal Director for Directed Energy Dr. Jim
Trebes notes is to demonstrate laser output power scaling
while maintaining or improving beam quality and
efficiency. HELSI is intended to strengthen the defense
industrial base for potential future directed-energy weapons
by providing near-term prototyping opportunities for
industry partners. Dr. Trebes additionally notes that
OUSD(R&E) has completed a DOD-wide Laser Lethality
Analysis Process Review to identify future needs for the
Department and best practices for DE development and use.