About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



1 1 (May 3, 2021)

handle is hein.crs/govedea0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




Congressional Research Service
Intorm~ng the legislative debate since 1914


0


May  3, 2021


Origins of SARS-CoV-2


In late 2019, a new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, was
identified in Wuhan, China. The virus, which causes
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19),  has contributed to
significant morbidity (illness) and mortality (death), as well
as severe public health and economic effects, among other
impacts. Several Members of Congress have made public
statements and introduced legislation calling for an
investigation into the origin of SARS-CoV-2. Determining
the origin and pathway by which a zoonotic disease (i.e.,
one that originated in animals) emerges and is transmitted
to humans can help scientists prevent further outbreaks,
inform the public health response, and aid in the
development of therapeutics and vaccines. Further, such
knowledge  may guide the development of policies and
practices that reduce the potential for the emergence of
other zoonotic diseases. Scientists note that determining the
origin of zoonotic diseases could take years, and in some
cases, an origin may never be conclusively identified.
In May 2020, the 73rd World Health Assembly (WHA)-
the governing body of the World Health Organization
(WHO)-passed a resolution  (WHA   73.1) requesting the
WHO   Director-General to identify the source of SARS-
CoV-2  and the route of transmission to humans, among
other things. WHO sent a team to China in July 2020 to
develop a work plan and begin collecting and analyzing
data, including
*  studies of all-cause mortality and deaths from
   respiratory diseases, including pneumonia, in and
   around Wuhan  in late 2019;
*  testing of stored animal samples for SARS-CoV-2;
*  national disease surveillance data; and
*  reports of retail pharmacy purchases of medicines to
   reduce fevers and treat cold and flu symptoms.
From  January 14 through February 10, 2021, a team of 34
experts-17  from China and 17 from other countries and
organizations-traveled to Wuhan to collect and analyze
existing and additional data. On March 30, 2021, WHO
released its report on the mission, which summarized
findings from site visits and discussions with Chinese local
and national experts. The report presented four hypotheses
on the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and assessed their likelihood
of being the cause.

Origin  Hypotheses:  Independent   Team   Findings
Hypotheses on SARS-CoV-2   origins follow and are
illustrated in Figure 1. The team's findings are italicized.
(1) Introduction through an intermediate host, a likely-
to-very-likely hypothesis that an intermediate host species,
infected by an animal reservoir host (the animal where the
virus lives, grows, and multiplies), carried the virus and


transmitted it to humans. No intermediate hosts have been
identified.
(2) Direct zoonotic spillover, a possible-to-likely
pathway through which SARS-CoV-2 could   have been
transmitted from an animal reservoir host to a human. Bats
are seen as a likely reservoir host, as several studies have
identified high genetic similarity between SARS-CoV-2
and coronaviruses found in certain bat species found in
China and elsewhere in South Asia.
(3) Introduction through cold/food-chain products, a
possible hypothesis positing that people contracted
SARS-CoV-2   through contact with contaminated food,
potentially including frozen, imported foodstuffs. SARS-
CoV-2  has been identified on frozen food, its packaging,
and cold-chain products (items stored at controlled
temperatures to preserve and extend shelf life).
(4) Introduction through a laboratory incident, an
extremely unlikely hypothesis considering whether
laboratory staff accidentally contracted and later spread
SARS-CoV-2   while researching coronaviruses in bats. The
WHO   report did not consider a hypothesis that the virus
was released intentionally, stating that it had been ruled out
by other scientists.
Ultimately, the investigators did not identify the source of
SARS-CoV-2   and recommended   further studies. The team
also called for regular administrative and internal reviews
of high-level biosafety laboratories worldwide to address
what they characterized as the need for more data.
U.S. Government Response to the Report
On  March 30, 2021, the United States and 13 other
countries issued a joint statement expressing concerns that
the international expert study on the source of the SARS-
CoV-2  virus was significantly delayed and lacked access to
complete, original data and samples. The statement also
called for immediate movement to a second phase of
investigation and that future missions be free to produce
independent and objective recommendations and findings.
The signatories expressed continued support for WHO and
urged further studies to determine SARS-CoV-2 origins.
U.S. Efforts to Control  Zoonotic  Diseases
For decades, U.S. federal agencies have worked to
strengthen international biosecurity and advance global
pandemic preparedness. These efforts are aimed at averting
the likelihood that scenarios listed in the hypotheses might
occur. This section summarizes selected efforts related to
the four hypotheses.


nttps://crsreport