About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



1 [1] (March 10, 2021)

handle is hein.crs/govecol0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





Congressional Research Service
Infr 1n0  thlesatv  deat  si 14


                                                                                                   March  10, 2021

Firearms Eligibility: Stalking- and Domestic Violence-Related

Provisions in H.R. 1620


The 117th Congress is considering the Violence Against
Women   Reauthorization Act of 2021 (H.R. 1620). This bill
includes several provisions that seek to reduce firearms-
related intimate partner violence (homicides and injury) by
amending  federal law to prohibit persons convicted of
misdemeanor  stalking crimes from receiving or possessing
a firearm or ammunition, as well as revising related
provisions governing domestic violence protection orders
and amending  a definition of intimate partner under
current law. This bill also includes other provisions related
to leveraging state, local, tribal, and territorial resources to
increase federal investigation and prosecution of firearms-
related eligibility offenses related to domestic violence and
stalking. The House passed a bill with identical provisions
in the 116th Congress (H.R. 1585).

Prohibited Persons and Domestic
Violence
Current law (18 U.S.C. §922(g)) prohibits nine categories
of persons from receiving or possessing firearms or
ammunition; and (18 U.S.C. §922(d)) prohibits any person
from transferring or otherwise disposing of a firearm or
ammunition  to any person if the transferor has reasonable
cause to believe the transferee would be prohibited under
one of those nine categories. Two of those categories speak
directly to domestic violence:

    persons  under  court-order restraints related to
    harassing, stalking, or threatening an  intimate
    partner or child of such intimate partner (18 U.S.C.
    §§922(d)(8) and (g)(8)); and
    persons  convicted of a  misdemeanor  crime  of
    domestic  violence (18  U.S.C. §§922(d)(9)  and
    (g)(9)).

Intimate  Partner   Definition
Under current law, the term intimate partner means, with
respect to a person, the spouse of the person, a former
spouse of the person, an individual who is a parent of a
child of the person, and an individual who cohabitates or
has cohabitated with the person (18 U.S.C. §921(a)(32)).
H.R. 1620 would expand  this definition to include

    a dating partner or former dating partner (as defined
    in section 2266 [of Title 18, United States Code]);
    and

    any other person similarly situated to a spouse who
    is protected by the domestic or family violence laws
    of the State or tribal jurisdiction in which the injury
    occurred or where the victim resides.


Under  18 U.S.C. §2266(a)(10), the term dating partner
refers to a person who is or has been in a social relationship
of a romantic or intimate nature with the abuser; and the
existence of such a relationship is based on a consideration
of (1) the length of the relationship; (2) the type of
relationship; and (3) the frequency of interaction between
the persons involved in the relationship.

Misdemeanor Crime of Stalking
H.R. 1620 would  make any person convicted of a
misdemeanor  crime of stalking a tenth category of
prohibited persons. The bill would define such a crime as
any misdemeanor  stalking offense under federal, state,
tribal, or municipal law; and one that (1) is a course of
harassment, intimidation, or surveillance of another person
that places that person in reasonable fear of material harm
to the health or safety of her or himself, an immediate
family member  of that person, a household member of that
person, or a spouse or intimate partner of that person; or (2)
causes, attempts to cause, or would reasonably be expected
to cause, emotional distress to any of those persons.

The proposed definition is subject to certain mitigating
factors. A person would not be considered to have been
convicted of a misdemeanor crime of stalking, unless (1)
the person was represented by counsel in the case, or (2)
they knowingly and intelligently waived the right to counsel
in the case. In the case of a prosecution for a misdemeanor
crime of stalking for which a person was entitled to a jury
trial, a person would not be considered convicted in the
jurisdiction in which the case was tried, unless (1) the case
was tried by a jury; or (2) the person knowingly and
intelligently waived the right to have the case tried by a
jury, by guilty plea, or otherwise.

Protection   Orders  or Court-Order Restraints
H.R. 1620 would also expand the scope of protection
orders or court-order restraints under 18 U.S.C.
§§922(d)(8) and (g)(8). Under current law these provisions
prohibit any person from firearms receipt, possession, or
transfer, who is subject to a court order that:

    (A) was issued after a hearing of which such person
    received actual notice, and at which such person had
    an opportunity to participate;

    (B) restrains such person from harassing, stalking,
    or threatening an intimate partner of such person or
    child  of such  intimate partner or  person, or
    engaging  in other conduct that would  place an
    intimate partner in reasonable fear of bodily injury
    to the partner or child; and


ittps://Crsreports.congress.gt


0