About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


1 [1] (June 30, 2015)

handle is hein.crs/crsmthaafkc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: CRS Insights Burma's Parliament Defeats Constitutional Amendments Michael F. Martin, Specialist in Asian Affairs (mnfmartin(icrs 1c rgo, 7-2199) June 30, 2015 (L 0 On June 25, 2015, Burma's parliament, the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, defeated five of six proposed onStitu ion a amendme.Is that arguably could have advanced democratic reforms in which Congress has shown an interest. Among the amendments voted down by the parliament was one that would have removed the restriction that prevents opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi from serving as Burma's president and another that would have lowered the threshold for amending the constitution from 75% to 70% of the total members of parliament. Under the provisions of Burma's 2008 constitution, which was written by the nation's most recent military junta, the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC), 75% of the total members of parliament (MPs)-or 498 of 664 members-must vote in favor of any proposed contsitutional amendment. This provision gives the 25% of the MPs who are military officers appointed by the Burmese military's commander-in-chief an effective veto over any constitutional changes. On the day of the vote, 583 MPs were present and 50 were absent; 31 seats currently are vacant. All 166 military MPs reportedly were present. Votes on the Defeated Amendments A proposal to remove the restriction in Section 59(f), which prohibits anyone whose legitimate children enjoy or are entitled to enjoy the rights and privileges of a subject of a foreign government or citizen of a foreign country from serving as president, was defeated by a vote of 371 for and 212 against. The section bars Aung San Suu Kyi as serving as president because her two sons are foreign nationals. The proposed amendment to Section 60(c), which would have required that candidates for president or vice president be members of parliament, was defeated by a vote of 386 for and 197 against. Amendments to Section 436(a) and 436(b), which would have reduced the threshold for amending the constitution from 75% to 70% of the MPs, were rejected by identical votes of 388 for and 195 against. Another amendment that would have altered Section 418(b), which terminates all parliamentary appointments (except for the president and two vice presidents) if a state of national emergency is declared, was defeated by a vote of 386 for and 197 against. The only amendment to pass was a technical change to Section 59(d), replacing the word military with defense in the list of eligibility qualifications for president. The votes on the proposed constitutional amendments were cast by secret ballot. Many observers speculate that the 166 military MPs voted against all five amendments. Depending on the amendment, a minimum of 31 to 46 civilian MPs voted against the amendments. It is likely that many of these MPs were members of the pro-military United Solidarity and Development Party (USDP), which holds a majority of parliamentary seats. Significance of the Amendments The defeated constitutional amendments were viewed by many parties, including opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, the Obama Administration, and some Members of Congress, as an important indicator of the willingness of Burma's political leaders to undertake additional political reforms. Prior to the vote, Aung San Suu Kyi stated that her party, the National League for Democracy (NLD), supported the amendments, even though the NLD wanted the constitutional amendment thresholds lowered to 67%. Following the amendments' defeat, a fellow NLDMP said. Now people clearly know who is not interested in reform and the wishes of the people.