About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



1 [1] (April 21, 2025)

handle is hein.crs/amymeabr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





         Congressional Research Service
~ Informing the legislative debate since   1914


                                                                                       Updated April 21, 2025

The Army's M-1E3 Abrams Tank Modernization Program


Background
The M-1 Abrams  Tank (Figure 1) is designed to maneuver
under fire and destroy enemy armored forces on the
battlefield. The M-1 is named for General Creighton
Abrams, a noted World War II armored battalion
commander  who later served as Army Chief of Staff from
1972 to 1974. M-1 Abrams tanks are the primary weapon
system in Armored Brigade Combat Teams (ABCTs). At
present, the Active Army has 11 ABCTs, and the Army
National Guard has 5 ABCTs. Each ABCT has 87 M-1
Abrams tanks.


Source: U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center, https://asc.army.mil/
web/portfolio-item/abrams-main-battle-tank/, accessed September 8,
2023.
The M-1 program began in 1971. In 1973, two contracts
were awarded by the Army for prototype development to
the Defense Division of Chrysler Corporation (which in
1982 became General Dynamics Land Systems [GDLS])
and the Detroit Diesel Allison Division of General Motors
(GM). In 1988, GDLS was awarded a contract for the M-
1A2 version, and the first M-1A2s began to enter service in
late 1992. The M-1A2 is the baseline export version of this
tank. The United States has sold M-1A1 and M-1A2
variants to Australia, Egypt, Iraq, Morocco, Kuwait, and
Saudi Arabia via Foreign Military Sales (FMS) and, in
2023, provided Ukraine with 31 M-1 Abrams tanks.

Ongoing MI Abrams
Modernization Efforts
M-1 Abrams  modernization efforts had been focused on
fielding a M-1A2 System Enhancement Package (SEP)
Version 3 (v3) and developing a new M-1A2 SEPv4
variant. According to the Army, both M-1A2 SEPv3
production and M-1A2 SEPv4 development began in
FY2018. In FY2020, the first unit was equipped with M-
1A2 SEPv3. In 2020, GDLS received a $4.6 billion contract


for SEPv3 upgrades, which are expected to be completed by
June 2028.

The   M-  I E3 Abrams
Modernization Program
On September 6, 2023, the Army announced it would
close out the M-1A2 SEPv4 effort and develop the M-1E3
Abrams. The Army's announcement quoted Major
General Glenn Dean, Program Executive Officer for
Ground Combat  Systems, describing the rationale for the
decision:

    The  Abrams   Tank  can  no  longer grow  its
    capabilities without adding weight, and we need to
    reduce its logistical footprint. The war in Ukraine
    has highlighted a critical need for integrated
    protections for soldiers, built from within instead of
    adding on.
The Army  announcement elaborated that the new platform

    [w]ill include the best features of the M-1A2 SEPv4
    and will comply  with the latest modular open
    systems architecture standards, allowing quicker
    technology upgrades and requiring fewer resources.
    This will enable the Army  and its commercial
    partners to design a more survivable, lighter tank
    that will be more effective on the battlefield at
    initial fielding, and easier to upgrade in the future.
Regarding M-1A2  SEPv3 production, the Army noted that
    the Army  will continue to produce the M-1A2
    SEPv3 at a reduced rate until production transitions
    to the M-1E3 Abrams.
The Army  originally projected achieving M-1E3 Initial
Operational Capability (IOC) in 2030.

Potential M- E3 Features and
Capabilities
While the Army has not made public the M-1E3's design
requirements, reportedly a 2019 Army Science Board study
on a future tank influenced senior Army leadership to
establish the M-1E3 program. The Army Science Board
study reportedly recommended a $2.9 billion, seven-year
program to develop a fifth generation combat vehicle,
with proposed capabilities including
  a hybrid electric drive;
  an autoloader and new main gun;
  advanced munitions, such as maneuvering hypersonic
   and gun-launched anti-tank guided missiles;
  integrated armor protection;


https://crsreports.congress.go