About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



Letter to the Honorable Jim Nussle [i] (January 2003)

handle is hein.congrec/cbo8312 and id is 1 raw text is: January 27, 2003

Honorable Jim Nussle
Chairman
Committee on the Budget
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
Dear Mr. Chairman:
The federal Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has prepared draft legislation
that would allow the Postal Service to reduce its annual payments to the Civil Service
Retirement System. In response to your request of January 15, 2003, the attached
report examines the potential impact of that proposal on the federal budget and raises
other relevant policy issues. CBO was specifically asked to consider the implications
of the draft legislation on the federal retirement system in general (including retiree
health benefits), on any unique aspects of the Postal Service as a federal employer,
and on the competitive setting in which the Postal Service operates.
Although reducing the Postal Service's payments to the retirement fund would
improve the agency's internal fiscal position, it could increase deficits or reduce
surpluses in the unified budget by as much as $10 billion to $15 billion over the
2003-2007 period and by as much as $36 billion to $41 billion over the 2003-20 13
period. The impact would depend on whether the Postal Service responded to its
improved fiscal position by delaying increases in postage rates, by increasing
spending, by repaying debt owed to the Treasury, or by some combination thereof.
A more-complete accounting for retirement costs, however, involves more than how
pensions are funded. It takes into account all retirement costs, including health
benefits. The Postal Service accounts for pension obligations as they are earned by
its employees, but it does not do the same for retiree health benefits. Those benefits
are paid for when its workers become retirees. Although that is true for all federal
agencies, it is particularly important for the Postal Service, which is required to set
postal rates to cover its full costs. Failure to recognize retiree health insurance
benefits as workers accrue them will only push those costs into the future. If the