About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


Comparison of OMB's and CBO's Technical Assumptions Used in Estimating Defense Spending [i] (April 2011)

handle is hein.congrec/cbo8025 and id is 1 raw text is: Congressional Budget Office Executive Office of the President U.S. Congress Office of Management and Budget APR 2 9 2011 The Honorable John Boehner Speaker of the House U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Mr. Speaker: Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 226, we hereby submit our joint report on the fiscal year 2012 outlay rates and prior-year outlays for accounts in Function 050 (National Defense). The enclosed tables present our areas of agreement and disagreement. * Table 1: Estimated Outlay Rates in Agreement (for regular appropriations); * Table 2: Estimates of Outlays in Agreement, from Enacted Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2011 and Prior Years; * Table 3: Estimated Outlay Rates in Disagreement (for regular appropriations); * Table 4: Estimates of Outlays in Disagreement, from Enacted Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2011 and Prior Years; and, * Table 5: Estimated Outlay Rates in Disagreement (for appropriations for overseas contingency operations). If you would like further information about this report, we would be pleased to provide it. The staff contacts are Kent Christensen (226-2840) at CBO and Farouk Ophaso (395-3853) at OMB. Respectfully submitted, Douglas El mendorf Jacob J. Lew Director Director Congressional Budget Office Office of Management and Budget Enclosures Identical letter sent to The Honorable Nancy Pelosi, The Honorable Carl Levin, The Honorable John McCain, The Honorable Daniel K. Inouye, The Honorable Thad Cochran, The Honorable Kent Conrad, and The Honorable Jeff Sessions