About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


Case Citations [1] (Spring 2025)

handle is hein.ali/retrdrue1209 and id is 1 raw text is: THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Spring 2025 Citations RESTITUTION AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT 3D Generally D.Or.2023. Cit. generally in case quot. in sup. Purchasers of a machine that extracted cannabinoids from hemp plants filed claims for unjust enrichment and breach of contract against seller that manufactured the machine, alleging that seller failed to timely deliver and install a machine that complied with the specifications required in the purchase agreement. This court denied in part plaintiffs' motion for default judgment, holding that plaintiffs failed to state a claim for unjust enrichment. The court explained that plaintiffs failed to show that their claim fell within an established category of unjust enrichment, as required to state a claim for unjust enrichment under Oregon law and the Restatement Third of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment. Farmer v. Thar Process, Inc., 705 F.Supp.3d 1218, 1228. D.Vt.2023. Cit. generally in case quot. in disc. Customer who suffered from Tourette's syndrome sued clothing store, police officers, and others, alleging that, after store's employees called the police to report him as a suspicious person, officers falsely imprisoned him by detaining him without probable cause and without any reasonable suspicion that he had engaged in criminal activity. This court denied officers' motions for summary judgment, holding that a genuine dispute of material fact existed as to whether customer's confinement was lawful and whether officers' restraint of customer was total such that officers were potentially liable for false imprisonment under the Restatement Second of Torts. The court noted that, where Vermont law was undeveloped, the Vermont Supreme Court frequently looked to the Restatements of the Law for guidance, including the Restatement Third of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment. Brush v. Old Navy LLC, 687 F.Supp.3d 452, 493. PART I. INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1. GENERAL PRINCIPLES § 1. Restitution and Unjust Enrichment D.Mont.2023. Cit. in sup. Non-tribal business that entered a commercial lease with a federally recognized Indian tribe to operate a campground on land held in trust for the tribe by the United States COPYRIGHT 02025 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.