About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


Case Citations [i] (Spring 2026)

handle is hein.ali/restfourfull4216 and id is 1 raw text is: THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Spring 2026 Citations THE FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW OF THE UNITED STATES 4TH: SELECTED TOPICS IN TREATIES, JURISDICTION, AND SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY PART III. STATUS OF TREATIES IN U.S. LAW § 301. Treaties as Law of the United States D.N.J.2025. Cit. in sup. Lawful permanent resident filed a habeas corpus petition after federal officials detained and sought to remove him from the United States based in part on the Secretary of State's determination under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) that his participation in antisemitic protests in the United States compromised a compelling foreign policy interest, alleging that the INA provision was unconstitutionally vague as applied to him in violation of the Due Process clause. This court held that resident was likely to succeed on the merits of his claim, because the Secretary did not determine that resident's conduct impacted U.S. relations with other countries and the provision did not put ordinary people on notice that they could be removed from the country based on conduct that was not linked to foreign policy. In support of its conclusion, the court noted that the Act's legislative history indicated that the provision would likely be used where the underlying conduct took place abroad, such when there would be a violation of a treaty to which the United States was a party, and that, according to Restatement Fourth of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States: Selected Topics in Treaties, Jurisdiction, and Sovereign Immunity § 301, treaties were overwhelmingly entered between the United States and other countries. Khalil v. Trump, 784 F.Supp.3d 705, 744. § 310. Self-Executing and Non-Self-Executing Treaty Provisions C.A.2, 2025. Com. (b) quot. in sup. As part of a wider dispute between insureds that sought to recover for hurricane damage to their commercial properties in Louisiana and London-based surplus lines insurers, the district court denied insurers' motion to compel arbitration pursuant to the policies under Article II Section 3 of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards COPYRIGHT C2026 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.