About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



Case Citations [1] (Spring 2025)

handle is hein.ali/restfourfull4213 and id is 1 raw text is: 






              * THE AMERICAN


                            LAW INSTITUTE



                                  Spring 2025 Citations



      THE FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW OF THE

   UNITED STATES 4TH: SELECTED TOPICS IN

   TREATIES, JURISDICTION, AND SOVEREIGN

                                 IMMUNITY



            PART  IV. JURISDICTION,  STATE  IMMUNITY,   AND  JUDGMENTS

                             CHAPTER 1.   PRESCRIPTION

    SUBCHAPTER A. EXERCISE OF PRESCRIPTIVE JURISDICTION BY THE UNITED
                                       STATES

§ 402. United States Practice with Respect to Jurisdiction to Prescribe

C.A.9, 2024. Subsec. (1) and coms. (e)-(k) cit. in sup. Syrian national, who was charged with violating
federal criminal statutes by designing or creating remote detonator switches for improvised explosive
devices used by an insurgent group to kill or injure American troops in Iraq, appealed his conviction.
The district court denied defendant's motion to dismiss a charge of conspiracy to maliciously damage or
destroy United States government property by means of an explosive, in which defendant argued that the
statute did not apply extraterritorially, and entered judgment on a jury verdict convicting defendant.
Affirming that portion of the decision, this court held that defendant's nationality did not counsel against
exterritorial application of the statute. The court reasoned, in part, that two of the five theories of
international criminal jurisdiction listed in Restatement of the Law Fourth, The Foreign Relations Law
of the United States: Selected Topics in Treaties, Jurisdiction, and Sovereign Immunity § 402 supported
the assertion of jurisdiction over defendant, including the passive personality principle, in which
jurisdiction was based on the nationality of the victim regardless of the accused's nationality, and the
protective principle, in which jurisdiction was based on whether a national interest or national security
was threatened or injured by the conduct in question. United States v. Alahmedalabdaloklah, 94 F.4th
782, 809.

                          COPYRIGHT 02025 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE
                                      All rights reserved
                                Printed in the United States of America
         For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.