About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


Case Citations [1] (July 2017 through April 2018)

handle is hein.ali/resndjmts0036 and id is 1 raw text is: JUDGMENTS 2D Generally Md.Spec.App.2017. Cit. generally in disc. In a foreclosure action brought by trustees for lien holder against homeowners who defaulted on a mortgage loan, this court affirmed the trial court judgment for plaintiffs, holding that defendants' claim that the loan secured by their property had been rescinded was barred by the doctrine of res judicata arising from their unsuccessful prior actions challenging the validity of the deed of trust on the property. The court noted that the Restatement Second of Judgments referred to the doctrine of res judicata as claim preclusion. Anand v. O'Sullivan, 168 A.3d 1030, 1034. CHAPTER 2. VALIDITY OF JUDGMENTS § 1. Requisites of a Valid Judgment Ind.App.2017. Quot. in sup. After the state tax court found that the department of revenue exceeded its authority by issuing jeopardy assessments against taxpayers and conducting a tax raid of their business, taxpayers brought federal-constitutional and state-law-tort claims arising from the raid against, among others, chief counsel for tax litigation in the office of the state attorney general in his personal capacity. The trial court entered judgment on a jury verdict against defendant. While reversing that portion of the judgment as unsupported, this court held that the trial court did not err by failing to instruct the jury that a void judgment was one that, from its inception, was a complete nullity and without legal effect. The court noted that, although the tax court declared the department of revenue's jeopardy assessments void as a matter of law, the jeopardy assessments were not judgments within the meaning of Restatement Second of Judgments § 1. Garwood v. State, 77 N.E.3d 204, 235. TOPIC 2. TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION § 5. Jurisdiction Over Persons Conn.App.2017. Com. (b) quot. in ftn. Broker brought an action for a turnover order to satisfy a judgment and damages award rendered in its favor by a Florida court against its former client, asserting that defendant had trust interest with assets held by another broker located in Connecticut. The trial court issued a turnover order. This court affirmed, holding, among other things, that the trial court properly exercised jurisdiction over the other broker and the trust assets, and that plaintiff did not have an obligation to serve a depository trust holding company in New York, where the trust assets were purportedly physically located. The court quoted Restatement Second of Judgments § 5, Comment b, in explaining that the distinctions between the traditional categories of territorial jurisdiction had largely A L Im For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.