About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


Case Citations [i] (Fall 2025)

handle is hein.ali/relwprpty0269 and id is 1 raw text is: THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Fall 2025 Citations PROPERTY Generally Ohio App.2024. Cit. generally in case cit. in sup. State, on behalf of its environmental protection agency, filed a complaint for injunctive relief against husband, wife, and son who jointly owned three properties and against three businesses that they operated on the properties, seeking civil penalties for violations of Ohio's water-pollution-control laws on the properties. Following a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment finding husband, wife, and son jointly and severally liable for the violations and awarding damages that included civil penalties and injunctive relief This court affirmed, holding that the penalties could be assessed against all recorded property owners, regardless of whether their actions caused or contributed to the violations. The court rejected husband's argument that wife and son were nominal owners of the properties who could not be jointly and severally liable for the violations, reasoning that a nominal owner was a legal owner under the Restatement of Property, and that husband failed to deny wife and son's individual liability at the pleadings stage or introduce any argument or evidence during the trial to demonstrate their nominal status. State ex rel. Yost v. Wylie, 246 N.E.3d 1089, 1105. DIVISION I. INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1. DEFINITION OF CERTAIN GENERAL TERMS Introductory Note C.A.6, 2025. Intro Note cit. in conc. op. Owners of a mobile home that was condemned and demolished by the city filed a § 1983 action against city, alleging, among other things, that city deprived them of their due process rights by not affording them the opportunity to be heard before the mobile home was torn down. The district court granted summary judgment for city. This court reversed in part and remanded, holding that there were issues of fact as to whether city provided owners with an adequate opportunity to be heard before the mobile home was demolished. The concurrence raised concerns about an evolving-standards approach to constitutional interpretation in which governments or city officials were able to state they provided a constitutionally adequate process by determining that the property COPYRIGHT C2025 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.