About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


Case Citations [1] (July 2020 - August 2021)

handle is hein.ali/reconlw0157 and id is 1 raw text is: CONFLICT OF LAWS CHAPTER 3. JURISDICTION IN GENERAL TOPIC 3. INSTURMENTALITIES FOR EXERCISING JURISDICTION TITLE B. LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION § 60. Exercise of Legislative Jurisdiction C.A.10, 2020. Com. (b) quot. in sup. Environmental groups challenged a determination by the National Park Service that a federal wildlife regulation, which prohibited hunting in national parks, did not apply to state- or privately-owned lands known as inholdings that were located within the exterior boundaries of Grand Teton National Park in Wyoming. The district court affirmed the National Park Service's action. This court affirmed in part, holding that the National Park Service's determination that the regulation did not apply to the park's private inholdings was not contrary to law or arbitrary and capricious. The court cited the definition of legislative jurisdiction set forth in Restatement of Conflict of Laws § 60 in reasoning, in part, that Wyoming did not cede to the National Park Service its legislative jurisdiction over private inholdings in the park. Defenders of Wildlife v. Everson, 984 F.3d 918, 925. CHAPTER 9. WRONGS TOPIC 1. TORTS § 377. The Place of Wrong C.A.2, 2021. Cit. in ftn. and in treatise cit. in ftn. (general cite). U.S. Department of Justice official sued newspaper, alleging that defendant published a defamatory declaration made by a Department intern asserting that plaintiff made unwelcome sexual contact with a coworker. The district court granted defendant's motion to dismiss. This court affirmed, holding, inter alia, that plaintiff's claim was barred by the New York fair-report privilege against defamation claims, because defendant was domiciled in New York, and the purportedly defamatory statement originated from New York. The court noted that, while New York had traditionally applied the law of the place of the tort as set forth by the Restatement of Conflict of Laws in resolving conflict-of-laws issues in tort claims, it now followed the modern approach as set forth by the Restatement Second of Conflict of Laws, which examined whether another state had a more significant relationship to the issue or the parties. Kinsey v. New York Times Company, 991 F.3d 171, 177. CHAPTER 12. PROCEDURE TOPIC 3. CONDITIONS OF MAINTAINING SUIT COPYRIGHT ©2021 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.