About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



Case Citations [i] (Spring 2026)

handle is hein.ali/aliliabil9936 and id is 1 raw text is: 





                            THE AMERICAN


                              LAW INSTITUTE



                                    Spring 2026 Citations



                       LIABILITY INSURANCE



     CHAPTER 2. MANAGEMENT OF POTENTIALLY INSURED LIABILITY CLAIMS

                                    TOPIC   1. DEFENSE

§ 19. Consequences of Breach of the Duty to Defend

Del.2025. Quot. in ftn. Administrator of Texas Medicaid program sued its primary and excess liability
insurers, alleging that insurers breached their duties to defend and indemnify administrator for a
settlement in an underlying breach-of-contract action filed against it by the State of Texas. After trial,
the trial court granted administrator's motion to set aside the jury verdict and request for a new trial.
This court affirmed, holding that insurers' breach of duty in refusing to defend administrator against the
underlying action excused administrator's contractual obligation to cooperate and seek consent from
insurers before settling the action. The court reasoned that an insured could make a reasonable
settlement and was then entitled to reimbursement for the settlement from an insurer, even if the policy
purported to avoid liability for settlements made without the insurer's consent, because, under New
York law and Restatement of Liability Insurance § 19, an insurer forfeited the right to assert any control
over the defense or settlement of an action that it breached its duty in refusing to defend. AIG Specialty
Insurance Company v. Conduent State Healthcare, LLC, 339 A.3d 680, 687.



         CHAPTER 3.   GENERAL PRINCIPLES REGARDING THE RISKS INSURED

                                   TOPIC   1. COVERAGE

§ 33. Timing of Events That Trigger Coverage

Del.2025. Quot. in ftn. Insured pharmaceutical company sued primary and excess insurers under two
sets of claims-made director-and-officer-liability policies covering different time periods, seeking a
declaration that an underlying securities class action filed against insured by its stockholders was a claim
made during the second period of coverage and was unrelated to insured's notice during the first period
of coverage of an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into its improper

                           COPYRIGHT C2026 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE
                                         All rights reserved
                                   Printed in the United States of America
          For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.