About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


Case Citations [1] (Spring 2025)

handle is hein.ali/aliemploy0046 and id is 1 raw text is: THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Spring 2025 Citations EMPLOYMENT LAW CHAPTER 1. EXISTENCE OF EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP § 1.04. Employees of Two or More Employers Or.App.2024. Subsec. (b) quot. in sup., cit. in case cit. in sup. Former employee of county library service district filed a whistleblower-retaliation claim against city, alleging that defendant's termination of employee was based on the recommendation of the director of the library-service district's administrative office, whose purportedly improper conduct was the subject of plaintiff's whistleblowing. The trial court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment. This court reversed and remanded, holding that defendant was plaintiff s joint employer and that there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether defendant knew or should have known of the director's bias when it terminated plaintiff. The court rejected defendant's assertion that it could not be held liable as plaintiff s joint employer because the county library service district exercised the right to control plaintiffs day-to-day activities, explaining that more than one employer could possess a right to control an employee under Restatement of Employment Law § 1.04(b). McClusky v. City of North Bend, 549 P.3d 557, 567. COPYRIGHT 02025 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.