About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


Case Citations [1] (July 2020 - April 2021)

handle is hein.ali/aggregate0023 and id is 1 raw text is: PRINCIPLES OF THE LAW OF AGGREGATE LITIGATION CHAPTER 2. AGGREGATE ADJUDICATION TOPIC 1. INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS § 2.02 Principles for the Aggregate Treatment of Common Issues N.D.Ill.2020. Subsec. (a)(1) quot. in sup.; subsec. (e) cit. in case quot. in sup. Customers who purchased beauty products from retail cosmetics stores in fifteen different states filed a proposed class action against owner of the stores, alleging that the stores had a practice of reshelving and reselling products that had been used and returned by dissatisfied customers. This court denied customers' motion for class certification, holding that customers did not meet their burden to show questions common to all class members that were centrally important to the resolution of the action, given customers' widely disparate injuries based on the different products they received. The court cited Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation § 2.02 in reasoning that, to the extent customers identified common issues, they were not central enough to their claims in relation to the overwhelming individual issues to justify certifying this case as a class action, even just with respect to those common issues. Smith-Brown v. Ulta Beauty, Inc., 335 F.R.D. 521, 535. COPYRIGHT ©2021 By THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination. ALI