About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



4 Docket Call 1 (1969)

handle is hein.abarchive/dockcalog0004 and id is 1 raw text is: 










Publishedby Section of General Practice American Bar Association


THE  CONSENSUS OF THE FIRST NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON
CURRENT PROBLEMS AFFECTING THE PRACTICING LAWYER
Chicago. Illinois
January 22-24. 1969


PREFACE
On   January 22-24. seventy-nine practicing
lawyers.  active in  their profession and
community. met in Chicago. Illinois.  for
the  First National Conference on Current
Problems  Affecting the Practicing Lawyer.
conducted   under the auspices of the Gen-
eral Practice Section of the American Bar
Association
    In this era of myriad social changes and
 with  the many   pressures and  demands
 being exerted upon the legal profession, the
 General Practice Section believed it was
 imperative that a group of American law-
 yers be  assembled  for  the purpose  of
 studying and discussing how% the legal pro-
 fession can most effectisely serse the needs of the
 public.
    William J Fuchs. of Philadelphia. Pennsylarnia.
Chairman  of the General PractiLe Section. and the
Officers of the Council of the Section. appointed
Richard  H1 Allen. of Memphis. Tennessee. to serve
as Chairman  of  the ( onference and Billie Bethel.
Executive  Director of the Tennessee  Bar Associa-
tion. to serve as Con sultant thereof
    The  inmited  ( onferees represented a  cross-
section relative to
    (II Gogrhical distribution.   In that the set-
enty-nine  attending (onferees  were residents of
forty -two different states across the Nation.
    2   1The slic of the laws firm II which  ea&h
Conferee  practiced. in that nine Conferees  were
sole praLtitioners. fifiteen w ere in t %k o-ieniber firms
forty-six wkere in firms hasing fic inenbers or less
and  thirts-three were in firms Of six nienihers or
more.
    (3) I he si/C Of townri or .itN in which each
Conferee  pratiLeed. in that  ten Conferees w &ere
from  a cit% has inrg a population of 5.000 or less.
fifteen were from -I city of 10.000 or less. twentsi-


four  were  from  a  city of 30.000  or  less, and
fifty-one were from a city of 100.000 or less. and
twenty-eight were  from a city of over 100.000 in
population

    Many  of  the Conferees were. and a  fewk weie
not.  members  of tle  ABA.  ard  some  hase heen
actise in the  ABA   1enty-nine   Conferees  were
currently members  of the ABA  House of Delegates
Some  have  never served on an ABA  Coninittee or
belonged  to a Section of the ABA. Approximately
torty percent of tihe Conferees. although practicing
lawyer . had never belonged to the General Practice
Section


    I or two days  the Conferees, in snall groups.
Lolisidered the sarious sublects hereinafter referred
to iii this consnsus, followsirig wshich the Moderators
arnd Reporters assigned to each subject drafted a
teritatiae consensus. On the third dad. the entire
assnibls of all Conferees examined. discusscd. and
Modified  tle tertatise conSmi sns as presented to
thneii. aid agreed upon this final consensus. whiich is
published in fill in th4s issne 0. /)ut ( ill


Volume  IV, Number  1


March, 1900