About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 257 (2003-2004)
Righting the Canoe: Title IX and the Decline of Men's Intercollegiate Athletics

handle is hein.journals/jmlr37 and id is 277 raw text is: RIGHTING THE CANOE: TITLE IX AND THE
DECLINE OF MEN'S INTERCOLLEGIATE
ATHLETICS
ANDREW J. BOYD*
INTRODUCTION
A. The Decline of Men's Intercollegiate Athletics
Men's intercollegiate athletics currently face a severe crisis.
Between 1981 and 1999 university athletic departments cut 171
wrestling teams from their rosters.! During that time, men's
intercollegiate athletics also suffered the loss of 84 tennis teams,
56 gymnastics teams, 27 track teams, and 25 swimming teams.'
When universities drop men's sports programs, men lose much
more than the opportunity to compete on the athletic field. They
also lose the opportunity to receive scholarship funds, and thereby
the opportunity to obtain a university education.3
B. Title IX's Effect on Men's Intercollegiate Athletics
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 was designed
to ensure that federally funded educational institutions provide
male and female students the equal opportunity to participate in
all aspects of the educational process.! The most controversial
aspects of Title IX are the way in which it has been applied to, and
J.D. Candidate, 2004.
1. Aaron Gabriel, Women Advancing, but at what Expense?, DAILY
HERALD (Ill.), June 26, 2002, § 2, at 10.
2. Id. at 1, 10.
3. Id. at 10. When university athletic programs cut men's sports, male
student athletes are often left with few options. St. Viator high school
graduate Josh Kay received a baseball scholarship from Iowa State
University, only to see the University drop its baseball team. Id. Unable to
secure a scholarship offer from another university, Kay chose to attend a local
community college. Id.
4. Susan M. Shook, Note, The Title IX Tug-of-War and Intercollegiate
Athletics in the 1990's: Nonrevenue Men's Teams Join Women Athletes in the
Scramble for Survival, 71 IND. L.J. 773, 774 (1996). Shook points out that
Title IX was not solely intended as a measure to assure equality of athletic
opportunity for males and females. Id. The legislation was broad in scope,
and it was not initially clear that Title IX applied to sports. Id. at 775.