About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



34 AIPLA Q. J. 1 (2006)
Who Wins Patent Infringement Cases

handle is hein.journals/aiplaqj34 and id is 11 raw text is: AIPLA QUARTERLY JOURNAL
VOLUME 34, NUMBER 1                       Page 1                            WINTER 2006
WHO WINS PATENT INFRINGEMENT CASES?
Paul M. Janicke & LiLan Ren*
I.       INTRODUCTION       ............................................................................................   3
A .      Constructing  the  Database ................................................................ 7
B.       Summary of the Observed Events ..................................................... 8
1.       Patent-Owner Winners and Accused-Infringer
W  inn ers  .............................................................................   8
2.       Limitations of the Data ................................................... 9
II.      RESULTS OF MULTIVARIATE REGRESSION ANALYSIS ................................... 11
A.       Regression with Patentee as Winner ............................................... 12
1.       Corporate Status and Income ....................................... 12
2.       Existence of a Jury Verdict ............................................ 14
3.       Type  of Law   Firm   ............................................................ 16
B.       Regression with Accused Infringer as Winner .............................. 17
1.       Corporate Status and Income ....................................... 17
2.       Existence of a Jury Verdict ........................................... 17
3.       Type  of Law   Firm   ............................................................ 18
C.       Insufficient Data on Effect of Technology Type ............................... 18
D.       Some Weaknesses of the Methodology ............................................ 18
III.     A CLOSER LOOK AT INDIVIDUAL FACTORS ................................................. 19
A .      Technology  Differences .................................................................... 19
B.       Factors Related  to  the Parties .........................................................  21
1.       Individual Patent Owner or Corporate Patent
O w n er  .............................................................................   21
©  2006. Paul M. Janicke, HIPLA      Professor of Law    and Co-Director, Institute for
Intellectual Property & Information Law, University of Houston Law Center; LiLan Ren,
J.D., 2005, University of Houston Law Center, Associate, Weil, Gotshal & Manges
(Houston office). The views expressed herein are our own and not those of any other
entity. However, we are most appreciative of the extensive and highly valuable research
assistance of Hal Borland, University of Houston Law Center, J.D., class of 2006. We are
also indebted to John Allison, Polk Wagner, Rochelle Dreyfuss, Kimberly Moore, and Jack
Goldstein for reviewing earlier drafts and providing valuable comments. Finally, we
thank the AIPLA Quarterly Journal staff for the many improvements made to the
manuscript during the editing process.