About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


67 Tenn. L. Rev. 627 (1999-2000)
The Timing of Opinion Formation by Jurors in Civil Cases: An Empirical Examination

handle is hein.journals/tenn67 and id is 637 raw text is: THE TIMING OF OPINION FORMATION BY JURORS IN CIVIL CASES: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION PAULA L. HANNAFORD, VALERIE P. HANS, NICOLE L. MoTT, AND G. THOMAS MUNSTERMAN Jurymen... have been prone to say that once the opening statements were made there was nothing left to the case.I [A]s many as 80 to 90 percent of all jurors have reached their ultimate verdict during or immediately after opening statements? Finally,... keep an open mind regarding each issue in the case until all of the evidence has been received? I. INTRODUCTION The question of when and how jurors form opinions about evidence presented at trial has been the focus of seemingly endless speculation. For lawyers, the question is how to capture the attention and approval of the jury at the earliest possible point in the trial. Their goal is to maximize the persuasiveness of their arguments--or at least to minimize the persuasiveness of those of the opposing side. Judges, in contrast, are more concerned about prejudgment. They regularly admonish jurors to suspend judgment until after all the evidence has been presented and after the jurors have been instructed on the law.4 * Paula L. Hannaford is Senior Research Associate, Nicole L. Mott is Research Associate, and G. Thomas Munsterman is Director of the Center for Jury Studies at the National Center for State Courts; Valerie P. Hans is Professor of Criminal Justice and Psychology at the University of Delaware. The authors wish to thank Shari S. Diamond, Robert MacCoun, and Mary Rose for their helpful comments on an earlier draft and Roxana M. Gonzalez, Michael P. Griffin, Heather V. Imhof, and Carrie V. Smith for their research assistance. The research reported in this Article was funded by a grant from the State Justice Institute (SJI-96-12A-B- 181) to the National Center for State Courts. The points of view expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official positions or policies of the State Justice Institute or the National Center for State Courts. For additional information about this project, please contact Paula L. Hannaford, National Center for State Courts, 300 Newport Avenue, Williamsburg, VA 23185 (telephone: 757-259-1556; e-mail: phannaford@ ncsc.dni.us). 1. ALFRED S. JULIEN, OPENING STATEMENTS § 1.01, at 2 (Supp. 1996). 2. DONALD E. VINSON, JURY TRIALS: THE PSYCHOLOGY OF WINNING STRATEGY 171 (1986). 3. KEviN F. O'MALLEY ET AL., IA FEDERAL JURY PRACTICE AND INSTRUCTIONS 9 (5th ed. 2000). 4. See id. 627