About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



65 Women Law. J. 26 (1979)
Lawyer as Juror

handle is hein.journals/wolj65 and id is 104 raw text is: LAWYER AS JUROR
by Betty G. Elder*

I received a Summons for Jury
Service to appear at the Federal
Courthouse for the Eastern District,
Brooklyn, New York on October 30,
1978. Instead of filing an excuse,
I decided it would provide an excel-
lent experience from a lay person's
point of view.
By 9 A.M. on the appointed morn-
ing, the jury room of the Eastern
District had filled up with about
two   hundred   prospective  jurors.
After filling out a preliminary ques-
tionnaire stating vital statistics, our
names were placed in a large drum.
The first phone call to the clerk
came at about 9:45, indicating that
a case was ready for trial.
On the second call, my name was
selected along with fifty others. We
proceeded upstairs to a courtroom
where the sitting judge informed us
that we had been summoned for
grand jury duty. He explained that
we would be required to sit every
Thursday for at least six months.
This of course proved to be a hard-
ship for many and they were ex-
cused.
When I identified my profession,
the judge was surprised. I explained
my interest in serving but was ex-
cused because, in the judge's words
'Your opinions would have an un-
duly strong influence on the jurors.'
Somewhat disappointed, I returned
to the jury room.
The next day, my name was again
selected. This time we were sum-
moned to Judge Eugene Nickerson's
courtroom. I had never appeared
before Judge Nickerson but I was
familiar with his reputation as an
* Betty G. Elder is Business Manager
of the NAWL Journal and in private prac-
tice in New York City.
26 WOMEN LAWYERS JOURNAL

outstanding  County   Executive for
Nassau prior to his appointment.
By the time the selection of a
petit jury of 12 persons was com-
pleted, there were only four of us
left from which to select two alter-
nates. When asked my profession,
I informed the judge and attorneys
I was a lawyer, having worked for
M.F.Y. Legal Services, the N.Y.C.
Human    Resources   Administration,
the N.Y. State Department of Social
Services but was now in private
practice. There was a hurried con-
ference between judge and attorneys,
and, unexpectedly, I was chosen as
First Alternate.
As an alternate, I was subject to
the same juror's oath and entitled to
sit with the jury throughout the
trial. If any member of the jury
was unable to serve or disqualified
prior to the time the jury retired to
consider its verdict, it was my func-
tion to replace that juror.
Judge Nickerson commented to me
that he had checked the Federal
Statute and that attorneys are not
prohibited or exempted from serving
on   jury  panels in  U.S. District
Courts.'
In fact, the intent of the Federal
Jury  Selection  and   Service  Act
(1968) is to encourage all citizens
of the state to serve as part of their
civil obligations.  The statute per-
mits each district court to specify if
jury selection is from voter regis-