About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



52 Temp. L.Q. 311 (1979)
All Courts Shall Be Open: The Public's Right to View Judicial Proceedings and Records

handle is hein.journals/temple52 and id is 317 raw text is: 1979]

ALL COURTS SHALL BE OPEN: THE PUBLIC'S RIGHT
TO VIEW JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS AND RECORDS *
A trial is a public event. What transpires in the court-
room is public property1
1. INTRODUCTION
The open court concept has long been recognized in English common
law.2  A  Philadelphia Common Pleas Court judge, in 1883, described the
scope of this right to an open courtroom as follows:
It involves, of course, the right of ingress and egress to and'from
the place where the court is held, to suitors, jurors, witnesses and
every person having business with the court. Also to all officers
of the court, especially those who have immediate business with
the court, as attorneys, etc. The general public also have the
right of admission to the court, as they are largely interested in
the public administration of law and justice.3
Courts in all American jurisdictions recognize this principle, at least to
some extent. The right to a public criminal trial, guaranteed in federal
criminal trials by the sixth amendment and required in state criminal trials
by the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment, is no longer ques-
tioned. The requirement of public civil trials, though not an enumerated
or even a penumbral constitutional guarantee, is nevertheless as old as the
guarantee in criminal proceedings.4
* The title of this comment is derived from William Penn's proclamation of the
Duke of York's laws for Pennsylvania in 1682. The full text of the clause reads:
All courts shall be open and justice shall neither be sold, denied, or delayed.
AMERICAN   PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY, MINUTES OF THE PROVINCIAL COUNCIL OF
PENNSYLVANIA 38 (1852).
1. Craig v. Harney, 381 U.S. 367, 374 (1947) (emphasis added).
2. See, e.g., Rex v. Josephson, [1948] 1 W.W.R. 93, 94 (Canada) (it is a
principle of the common law that a court must be open and public, and that if those
requirements are not met there is no court and all the proceedings are void);
Scott v. Scott, [1913] A.C. 417, 422-23 (Haldone, J.) (the rule of English law is
that all cases must be heard in open court subject to certain specified classes of
exceptions); Holt v. Willing, 9 Tasm. L.R. 70, 70 (1913) (The ordinary inci-
dent of a Court of Justice is that its proceedings should be conducted in public;
the broad principle being that the administration of justice shall take place in open
court).
3. Pierce, All Courts Shall Be Open, 37 PITT. L.J. 362, 362 (1883). Judge
Pierce was writing the account of an attorney who was forcibly restrained from
entering a crowded courtroom by an obstinate officer. Judge Pierce criticized the
attorney's conduct as endangering the peace of the court, but conceded the attorney's
right to enter. The judge urged those who believe they are wrongly denied access
to his court to seek redress from him, and not to attempt to force their ways in by
colorful verbal persuasion. Id.
4. H. CRoss, THE PEOPLE'S RIGHT TO KNOW: LEGAL ACCESS TO PUBLIC RECORDS
AND PROCEEDINGS 155 (1953). Sir Matthew Hale, in 1670, was probably the first

(311)